Shared Responsibility Model vs. Traditional On-Premises Model: Key Differences in Cloud Computing

Last Updated Apr 12, 2025

The Shared Responsibility Model in cloud computing distributes security and management tasks between the cloud provider and the customer, enhancing flexibility and scalability compared to the traditional on-premises model where the organization handles all infrastructure responsibilities. Cloud providers secure the underlying infrastructure, while customers focus on securing applications, data, and user access. This shift reduces the burden of hardware maintenance and allows businesses to leverage advanced security tools and continuous updates managed by the provider.

Table of Comparison

Aspect Shared Responsibility Model (Cloud) Traditional On-Premises Model
Security Ownership Cloud provider manages infrastructure security; customer handles data and access security. Organization responsible for all security layers, including hardware, software, and data.
Infrastructure Management Managed by cloud provider; scalable and maintained continuously. Fully managed by internal IT teams; requires manual upgrade and maintenance.
Cost Model Pay-as-you-go; reduces capital expenditure. High upfront capital investment; fixed ongoing costs.
Compliance Cloud provider complies with industry standards; customer ensures data usage compliance. Organization fully accountable for meeting compliance and audits.
Scalability Rapid and flexible resource scaling on demand. Limited by physical hardware capacity; scaling requires procurement.
Disaster Recovery Built-in or optional cloud disaster recovery services. Requires dedicated DR infrastructure and procedures.

Introduction to Cloud Computing Responsibility Models

Cloud computing responsibility models define the division of security and management tasks between cloud providers and users, contrasting sharply with traditional on-premises setups where organizations maintain full control. The Shared Responsibility Model delegates infrastructure security to providers like AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud, while users handle data protection, identity management, and application security. This approach enhances scalability and reduces operational burdens compared to the sole responsibility borne in on-premises environments.

Defining the Shared Responsibility Model

The Shared Responsibility Model in cloud computing delineates security and operational duties between cloud service providers and customers, ensuring clarity in managing infrastructure, applications, and data. Unlike the traditional on-premises model where all responsibilities lie with the organization, this model allocates tasks such as physical security and network infrastructure maintenance to providers while customers handle data protection and user access. Defining this division enhances security posture and operational efficiency by leveraging provider expertise and customer control.

Understanding the Traditional On-Premises Model

The Traditional On-Premises Model requires organizations to manage and secure all aspects of their IT infrastructure, including physical servers, networking, storage, and software applications. This approach places full responsibility for hardware maintenance, data protection, and system updates on the internal IT team, often demanding significant capital expenditure and manpower. Unlike cloud environments, on-premises setups offer direct control but lack the scalability and flexibility inherent in modern cloud solutions.

Key Differences: Shared vs On-Premises Responsibility

The Shared Responsibility Model in cloud computing delineates security tasks between the cloud provider and the customer, where providers manage infrastructure security while customers handle data protection and user access. In contrast, the Traditional On-premises Model places full responsibility on the organization for securing hardware, software, and network components internally. This key difference shifts operational complexity and resource allocation, enabling cloud users to leverage scalable infrastructure without managing physical security directly.

Security Responsibilities in Cloud and On-Premises Models

In the Shared Responsibility Model of cloud computing, security duties are split between the cloud provider and the customer, where providers secure the infrastructure while customers manage data protection and access controls. Conversely, the traditional on-premises model places full security responsibility on the organization, requiring internal teams to handle hardware, software, network security, and compliance. Cloud environments benefit from inherent provider security investments and continuous updates, whereas on-premises setups demand significant resource allocation for maintaining and auditing security measures.

Compliance and Regulatory Considerations

In cloud computing's Shared Responsibility Model, compliance and regulatory responsibilities are divided between the cloud service provider and the customer, with providers managing infrastructure security and customers overseeing data governance and access controls. Traditional On-premises Models place full compliance accountability on the organization, requiring in-house management of physical security, network safeguards, and regulatory adherence. The Shared Responsibility Model facilitates scalable compliance management aligned with standards like GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS by leveraging provider certifications and shared controls.

Cost Management and Resource Allocation

The Shared Responsibility Model in cloud computing reduces upfront capital expenses by shifting infrastructure management to cloud providers, enabling dynamic cost management through pay-as-you-go pricing. Traditional on-premises models require substantial investment in hardware and ongoing maintenance, often leading to fixed and underutilized resource costs. Cloud environments optimize resource allocation with scalable, automated provisioning, whereas on-premises setups demand manual scaling and capacity planning, impacting overall operational efficiency.

Operational Control and Flexibility

The Shared Responsibility Model in cloud computing allocates operational control between cloud providers and customers, enhancing flexibility by allowing organizations to focus on application management while providers handle infrastructure security and maintenance. Traditional on-premises models grant organizations full operational control but require significant resources to manage infrastructure, updates, and security independently. This shift in operational responsibilities under the Shared Responsibility Model optimizes resource allocation and accelerates innovation by reducing the burden of infrastructure management.

Risk Management in Each Model

In the Shared Responsibility Model of cloud computing, risk management is distributed between cloud service providers and customers, where providers secure the infrastructure while customers manage data, user access, and application security. Conversely, the Traditional On-premises Model places full responsibility on the organization to secure hardware, software, networks, and data, necessitating comprehensive in-house risk management strategies and resources. The Shared Responsibility Model reduces certain operational risks through cloud provider safeguards but introduces risks related to data privacy and compliance that must be actively managed by users.

Choosing the Right Model for Your Organization

Selecting the ideal computing model requires assessing your organization's security capabilities, compliance requirements, and resource availability. In the Shared Responsibility Model, cloud providers manage infrastructure security while clients focus on data protection and access control, reducing operational overhead. Conversely, traditional on-premises solutions demand full responsibility for hardware, software, and security, offering greater control but increased management complexity and costs.

Shared Responsibility Model vs Traditional On-premises Model Infographic

Shared Responsibility Model vs. Traditional On-Premises Model: Key Differences in Cloud Computing


About the author.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Shared Responsibility Model vs Traditional On-premises Model are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet