In-Display Sensor vs. Rear-Mounted Sensor: Which Mobile Technology is Better?

Last Updated Apr 12, 2025

In-display sensors offer a sleek, seamless design by embedding fingerprint recognition beneath the screen, enhancing user experience with faster unlocking and increased screen real estate. Rear-mounted sensors provide reliable and accurate fingerprint scanning, often favored for ergonomic placement and ease of access when holding the device. Choosing between these sensor types depends on personal preference for aesthetics versus practicality in mobile pet technology interfaces.

Table of Comparison

Feature In-Display Fingerprint Sensor Rear-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor
Location Under the screen On the back panel
Design Impact Seamless, modern look Visible sensor, traditional design
Usability Easier one-handed use on large phones Natural placement for index finger
Speed Generally slower than rear sensor Fast and accurate recognition
Technology Type Optical or Ultrasonic sensor Capacitive sensor
Durability No physical button, less wear Prone to scratches and wear
Cost Higher manufacturing cost Lower manufacturing cost
Compatibility Requires specific OLED displays Compatible with all screen types

Introduction to In-Display and Rear-Mounted Sensors

In-display sensors integrate fingerprint recognition technology beneath the smartphone screen, enabling users to unlock devices without physical buttons. Rear-mounted sensors are positioned on the back of the device, offering quick and ergonomic fingerprint access with traditional capacitive technology. Both sensor types enhance mobile security but differ in user experience and design integration.

How In-Display Sensors Work

In-display sensors operate by embedding biometric scanning technology beneath the smartphone screen, using optical or ultrasonic waves to capture fingerprint data through the glass. Optical sensors illuminate the finger and create a detailed image from the light reflected back, while ultrasonic sensors emit high-frequency sound waves that measure the ridges and valleys of fingerprints with higher accuracy and enhanced security. This integration allows for seamless design and larger screen-to-body ratios, eliminating the need for separate sensor areas on the rear or side of the device.

How Rear-Mounted Sensors Work

Rear-mounted sensors operate by positioning the fingerprint scanner on the back of the mobile device, directly beneath the surface, allowing users to unlock their phones with a simple finger touch. These sensors typically use capacitive technology to detect the unique patterns of the fingerprint by measuring electrical currents, providing high accuracy and fast recognition. Compared to in-display sensors, rear-mounted sensors benefit from faster response times and lower power consumption due to their exposed placement and mature sensor technology.

Design and Aesthetics Comparison

In-display sensors offer a sleek and modern design by embedding fingerprint recognition seamlessly beneath the screen, eliminating visible sensor bumps and preserving the front's uninterrupted glass surface. Rear-mounted sensors, while often more accessible for thumb reach, tend to disrupt the phone's minimalist aesthetic with their protruding modules. The in-display technology promotes a cleaner, more futuristic look that aligns with contemporary design trends in mobile devices, enhancing overall visual appeal.

Speed and Accuracy: Testing Both Technologies

In-display sensors utilize optical or ultrasonic technology to scan fingerprints directly through the screen, offering rapid authentication with response times averaging 0.2 to 0.3 seconds, while rear-mounted sensors, relying on capacitive touch, frequently achieve faster recognition speeds near 0.15 seconds. Accuracy rates for in-display sensors are typically around 98%, influenced by screen protectors and lighting conditions, whereas rear-mounted sensors consistently deliver up to 99.5% accuracy due to direct contact and less interference. Extensive testing under varied environmental scenarios reveals rear-mounted sensors maintain superior reliability in speed and precision, particularly in high-moisture or low-light conditions, despite the aesthetic advantages of in-display alternatives.

User Experience and Accessibility

In-display sensors enhance user experience by offering seamless fingerprint recognition without interrupting screen visibility, promoting a sleek, edge-to-edge display design. Rear-mounted sensors provide quick and ergonomic access, especially for one-handed use, but may cause usability issues when the phone is placed on flat surfaces. Accessibility is improved with in-display sensors as they accommodate a wider range of hand positions and gestures, supporting users with varied grip styles and mobility constraints.

Security Differences: Which Is Safer?

In-display fingerprint sensors provide enhanced security by integrating biometric authentication beneath the screen, reducing the risk of physical tampering compared to rear-mounted sensors that are more exposed. Rear-mounted sensors are vulnerable to smudge attacks and physical damage, whereas in-display technology employs ultrasonic or optical methods that offer improved accuracy and protection against spoofing. The advanced encryption protocols paired with in-display sensors contribute to stronger security measures in modern mobile devices.

Durability and Maintenance

In-display sensors integrate seamlessly beneath the screen, reducing exposure to physical wear and tear, thereby enhancing overall durability compared to rear-mounted sensors, which are more prone to scratches and accidental damage due to their external placement. Maintenance of in-display sensors generally requires specialized servicing because of their embedded design, whereas rear-mounted sensors allow easier access for cleaning or replacement without specialized tools. Choosing between the two impacts device longevity and repair costs, with in-display technology offering a sleeker, more protected option but potentially higher maintenance complexity.

Market Trends and Device Availability

In-display fingerprint sensors have gained significant traction in flagship smartphones, driven by consumer demand for seamless design and enhanced screen-to-body ratios, with brands like Samsung and OnePlus leading market adoption. Rear-mounted sensors remain prevalent in mid-range and budget devices due to cost-effectiveness and reliable performance, maintaining a substantial share in emerging markets. Market trends indicate a gradual shift towards in-display sensors as manufacturing costs decrease and technology advances, expanding availability across a broader spectrum of device tiers.

Future Prospects of Biometric Sensors in Mobile Technology

In-display biometric sensors are poised to dominate future mobile technology due to their seamless integration and enhanced user experience, offering faster and more secure authentication methods compared to traditional rear-mounted sensors. Advances in optical and ultrasonic in-display fingerprint scanning technologies promise higher accuracy, better under-screen visibility, and increased durability, making them ideal for next-generation smartphones. As mobile devices continue to evolve towards bezel-less designs, in-display sensors will become the standard in biometric security, surpassing rear-mounted sensors in both functionality and consumer preference.

In-display sensor vs Rear-mounted sensor Infographic

In-Display Sensor vs. Rear-Mounted Sensor: Which Mobile Technology is Better?


About the author.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about In-display sensor vs Rear-mounted sensor are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet